American Athletic Conference Football

Leaders

 

Team Statistics

 

SCORING OFFENSE G TD FG XPT 2XP DXP Saf Points Avg/G
1. SMU 8 46 7 39 3 0 0 342 42.8
2. Memphis 8 44 9 43 0 0 0 334 41.8
3. Navy 8 45 6 43 1 0 0 333 41.6
4. UCF 8 43 8 41 1 0 1 327 40.9
5. Tulane 8 33 7 33 0 0 0 252 31.5
6. Cincinnati 8 29 12 28 1 1 0 242 30.2
7. Tulsa 8 28 12 27 0 0 0 231 28.9
8. Houston 8 27 14 24 1 0 0 230 28.8
9. ECU 8 26 15 23 0 0 0 224 28.0
10. Temple 8 26 9 24 0 0 0 207 25.9
11. USF 8 21 4 20 0 0 0 158 19.8
12. UConn 8 15 5 14 1 0 0 121 15.1
 
SCORING DEFENSE G TD FG XPT 2XP DXP Saf Points Avg/G
1. Cincinnati 8 19 13 15 1 0 0 170 21.2
2. Navy 8 23 7 23 0 0 0 182 22.8
3. UCF 8 24 11 21 0 0 0 198 24.8
4. Temple 8 28 5 28 0 1 0 213 26.6
5. Memphis 8 26 12 22 3 0 0 220 27.5
6. USF 8 32 7 30 1 0 0 245 30.6
7. Tulane 8 30 15 27 0 0 0 252 31.5
8. SMU 8 32 15 29 2 0 0 270 33.8
9. Tulsa 8 36 7 34 0 0 0 271 33.9
10. Houston 8 38 6 38 0 0 1 286 35.8
11. ECU 8 45 6 43 1 0 0 333 41.6
12. UConn 8 50 4 49 0 0 0 361 45.1
 
TOTAL OFFENSE G Rush Pass Plays Yards Avg/P TD Avg/G
1. UCF 8 1666 2537 627 4203 6.7 42 525.4
2. SMU 8 1364 2523 632 3887 6.2 44 485.9
3. Navy 8 3046 795 547 3841 7.0 44 480.1
4. Memphis 8 1390 2408 542 3798 7.0 41 474.8
5. Tulane 8 1906 1723 602 3629 6.0 30 453.6
6. Tulsa 8 1271 2348 633 3619 5.7 27 452.4
7. ECU 8 913 2617 605 3530 5.8 25 441.2
8. Houston 8 1307 1877 526 3184 6.1 24 398.0
9. Temple 8 1142 1949 582 3091 5.3 24 386.4
10. Cincinnati 8 1602 1314 539 2916 5.4 26 364.5
11. USF 8 1356 1422 531 2778 5.2 21 347.2
12. UConn 8 923 1852 548 2775 5.1 15 346.9
 
TOTAL DEFENSE G Rush Pass Plays Yards Avg/P TD Avg/G
1. Navy 8 930 1841 504 2771 5.5 21 346.4
2. UCF 8 1286 1654 608 2940 4.8 22 367.5
3. Memphis 8 1405 1727 586 3132 5.3 25 391.5
4. Tulsa 8 1518 1705 555 3223 5.8 32 402.9
5. Temple 8 1298 1945 625 3243 5.2 28 405.4
6. Cincinnati 8 1149 2111 603 3260 5.4 18 407.5
7. USF 8 1775 1493 572 3268 5.7 30 408.5
8. Tulane 8 1531 1855 563 3386 6.0 29 423.2
9. Houston 8 1580 2081 536 3661 6.8 37 457.6
10. SMU 8 1291 2497 620 3788 6.1 30 473.5
11. UConn 8 2072 2119 540 4191 7.8 47 523.9
12. ECU 8 2051 2337 602 4388 7.3 44 548.5
 
RUSHING OFFENSE G Att Yards Avg. TD Yards/G
1. Navy 8 483 3046 6.3 37 380.8
2. Tulane 8 380 1906 5.0 18 238.2
3. UCF 8 331 1666 5.0 22 208.2
4. Cincinnati 8 335 1602 4.8 16 200.2
5. Memphis 8 299 1390 4.6 17 173.8
6. SMU 8 312 1364 4.4 18 170.5
7. USF 8 308 1356 4.4 9 169.5
8. Houston 8 310 1307 4.2 10 163.4
9. Tulsa 8 328 1271 3.9 12 158.9
10. Temple 8 298 1142 3.8 10 142.8
11. UConn 8 276 923 3.3 3 115.4
12. ECU 8 285 913 3.2 7 114.1
 
RUSHING DEFENSE G Att Yards Avg. TD Yards/G
1. Navy 8 257 930 3.6 7 116.2
2. Cincinnati 8 311 1149 3.7 6 143.6
3. UCF 8 370 1286 3.5 10 160.8
4. SMU 8 341 1291 3.8 10 161.4
5. Temple 8 336 1298 3.9 12 162.2
6. Memphis 8 339 1405 4.1 15 175.6
7. Tulsa 8 345 1518 4.4 22 189.8
8. Tulane 8 309 1531 5.0 11 191.4
9. Houston 8 294 1580 5.4 18 197.5
10. USF 8 369 1775 4.8 19 221.9
11. ECU 8 351 2051 5.8 21 256.4
12. UConn 8 323 2072 6.4 28 259.0
 
PASS OFFENSE G Comp Att Int   Pct. Yards Avg. TD Avg/G
1. ECU 8 197 320 6 61.6 2617 8.2 18 327.1
2. UCF 8 176 296 5 59.5 2537 8.6 20 317.1
3. SMU 8 196 320 6 61.2 2523 7.9 26 315.4
4. Memphis 8 155 243 5 63.8 2408 9.9 24 301.0
5. Tulsa 8 173 305 8 56.7 2348 7.7 15 293.5
6. Temple 8 174 284 5 61.3 1949 6.9 14 243.6
7. Houston 8 117 216 11 54.2 1877 8.7 14 234.6
8. UConn 8 159 272 10 58.5 1852 6.8 12 231.5
9. Tulane 8 127 222 8 57.2 1723 7.8 12 215.4
10. USF 8 120 223 7 53.8 1422 6.4 12 177.8
11. Cincinnati 8 109 204 7 53.4 1314 6.4 10 164.2
12. Navy 8 32 64 4 50.0 795 12.4 7 99.4
 
PASS DEFENSE G Comp Att Int   Pct. Yards Avg. TD Avg/G
1. USF 8 131 203 8 64.5 1493 7.4 11 186.6
2. UCF 8 135 238 9 56.7 1654 6.9 12 206.8
3. Tulsa 8 126 210 4 60.0 1705 8.1 10 213.1
4. Memphis 8 142 247 6 57.5 1727 7.0 10 215.9
5. Navy 8 138 247 10 55.9 1841 7.5 14 230.1
6. Tulane 8 141 254 5 55.5 1855 7.3 18 231.9
7. Temple 8 157 289 5 54.3 1945 6.7 16 243.1
8. Houston 8 144 242 6 59.5 2081 8.6 19 260.1
9. Cincinnati 8 156 292 13 53.4 2111 7.2 12 263.9
10. UConn 8 139 217 4 64.1 2119 9.8 19 264.9
11. ECU 8 161 251 6 64.1 2337 9.3 23 292.1
12. SMU 8 165 279 6 59.1 2497 8.9 20 312.1
 
PASS EFFICIENCY G Comp Att Int   Pct. Yards TD Effic.
1. Navy 8 32 64 4 50.0 795 7 177.9
2. Memphis 8 155 243 5 63.8 2408 24 175.5
3. SMU 8 196 320 6 61.3 2523 26 150.5
4. UCF 8 176 296 5 59.5 2537 20 150.4
5. ECU 8 197 320 6 61.6 2617 18 145.1
6. Houston 8 117 216 11 54.2 1877 14 138.4
7. Tulane 8 127 222 8 57.2 1723 12 133.0
8. Tulsa 8 173 305 8 56.7 2348 15 132.4
9. Temple 8 174 284 5 61.3 1949 14 131.7
10. UConn 8 159 272 10 58.5 1852 12 122.9
11. USF 8 120 223 7 53.8 1422 12 118.9
12. Cincinnati 8 109 204 7 53.4 1314 10 116.9
 
PASS DEFENSE EFFIC. G Comp Att Int   Pct. Yards TD Effic.
1. Cincinnati 8 156 292 13 53.4 2111 12 118.8
2. UCF 8 135 238 9 56.7 1654 12 124.2
3. Memphis 8 142 247 6 57.5 1727 10 124.7
4. Temple 8 157 289 5 54.3 1945 16 125.7
5. Navy 8 138 247 10 55.9 1841 14 129.1
6. Tulane 8 141 254 5 55.5 1855 18 136.3
7. USF 8 131 203 8 64.5 1493 11 136.3
8. Tulsa 8 126 210 4 60.0 1705 10 140.1
9. Houston 8 144 242 6 59.5 2081 19 152.7
10. SMU 8 165 279 6 59.1 2497 20 153.7
11. ECU 8 161 251 6 64.1 2337 23 167.8
12. UConn 8 139 217 4 64.1 2119 19 171.3
 
KICKOFF RETURNS G No. Yards TD Avg.
1. Memphis 8 30 873 3 29.1
2. SMU 8 25 657 1 26.3
3. Tulane 8 32 734 1 22.9
4. Cincinnati 8 16 357 0 22.3
5. UConn 8 32 646 0 20.2
6. Houston 8 18 363 1 20.2
7. Temple 8 27 514 0 19.0
8. Tulsa 8 19 349 0 18.4
9. USF 8 17 312 0 18.4
10. ECU 8 33 542 1 16.4
11. UCF 8 13 208 0 16.0
12. Navy 8 7 101 0 14.4
 
PUNT RETURN AVG G No. Yards TD Avg.
1. UConn 8 4 63 0 15.8
2. ECU 8 6 52 0 8.7
3. SMU 8 16 138 0 8.6
4. Houston 8 12 98 1 8.2
5. Memphis 8 14 108 0 7.7
6. UCF 8 12 91 0 7.6
7. Navy 8 15 111 0 7.4
8. Cincinnati 8 17 124 0 7.3
9. Tulane 8 12 82 0 6.8
10. USF 8 7 39 0 5.6
11. Temple 8 3 6 0 2.0
12. Tulsa 8 6 7 0 1.2
 
INTERCEPTIONS G No. Yards TD Avg.
1. Cincinnati 8 13 215 3 16.5
2. Navy 8 10 46 1 4.6
3. UCF 8 9 126 1 14.0
4. USF 8 8 210 0 26.2
5. Memphis 8 6 20 0 3.3
6. Houston 8 6 83 1 13.8
7. SMU 8 6 66 1 11.0
8. ECU 8 6 22 0 3.7
9. Tulane 8 5 35 1 7.0
10. Temple 8 5 38 1 7.6
11. Tulsa 8 4 33 0 8.2
12. UConn 8 4 95 0 23.8
 
PUNTING G No. Yards Avg/P Ret. Avg. TB Net/P
1. Houston 8 37 1748 47.2 71 1.9 2 44.2
2. Navy 8 24 1054 43.9 21 0.9 1 42.2
3. Cincinnati 8 42 1804 43.0 42 1.0 0 42.0
4. Temple 8 45 1763 39.2 26 0.6 1 38.2
5. Memphis 8 23 977 42.5 84 3.7 1 38.0
6. UConn 8 49 2021 41.2 69 1.4 5 37.8
7. UCF 8 37 1493 40.4 58 1.6 2 37.7
8. USF 8 47 2074 44.1 229 4.9 4 37.6
9. Tulane 8 28 1172 41.9 63 2.2 3 37.5
10. Tulsa 8 38 1582 41.6 120 3.2 3 36.9
11. SMU 8 41 1590 38.8 18 0.4 4 36.4
12. ECU 8 45 1792 39.8 118 2.6 4 35.4
 
KICKOFF COVERAGE G No. Yards Avg. Return TB Net Avg.
1. Temple 8 43 2557 59.5 220 22 41.6
2. Memphis 8 59 3753 63.6 382 37 41.5
3. Tulane 8 45 2650 58.9 319 21 40.1
4. UCF 8 59 3615 61.3 430 33 40.0
5. UConn 8 27 1569 58.1 299 9 38.7
6. ECU 8 43 2646 61.5 258 29 38.7
7. Houston 8 47 2565 54.6 328 17 38.6
8. Cincinnati 8 47 2692 57.3 681 8 38.5
9. Tulsa 8 47 2579 54.9 739 3 37.6
10. Navy 8 58 3193 55.1 759 11 37.2
11. SMU 8 55 2969 54.0 746 9 36.3
12. USF 8 33 1771 53.7 495 7 33.4
 
FIELD GOALS G Made-Att Pct.
1. Temple 8 9-10 .900
2. UCF 8 8-9 .889
3. ECU 8 15-17 .882
4. SMU 8 7-8 .875
5. Houston 8 14-17 .824
6. Memphis 8 9-11 .818
7. Cincinnati 8 12-15 .800
8. Navy 8 6-8 .750
9. Tulane 8 7-11 .636
10. Tulsa 8 12-20 .600
11. UConn 8 5-9 .556
12. USF 8 4-10 .400
 
PAT KICKING G Made-Att Pct.
1. Memphis 8 43-43 1.000
UCF 8 41-41 1.000
Tulane 8 33-33 1.000
Cincinnati 8 28-28 1.000
Houston 8 24-24 1.000
ECU 8 23-23 1.000
UConn 8 14-14 1.000
8. Navy 8 43-44 .977
9. Tulsa 8 27-28 .964
10. USF 8 20-21 .952
11. SMU 8 39-41 .951
12. Temple 8 24-26 .923
 
SACKS BY G No. Yards
1. SMU 8 35 195
2. Temple 8 29 193
3. UCF 8 23 159
4. Memphis 8 22 140
5. Navy 8 20 119
6. Cincinnati 8 17 102
7. Houston 8 15 95
USF 8 15 94
9. Tulane 8 12 57
ECU 8 12 67
11. UConn 8 11 76
Tulsa 8 11 76
 
SACKS AGAINST G No. Yards
1. ECU 8 9 87
2. Navy 8 11 71
3. SMU 8 13 82
Memphis 8 13 75
Temple 8 13 82
6. UCF 8 16 100
7. Cincinnati 8 19 125
8. Tulane 8 22 137
9. Tulsa 8 23 130
10. UConn 8 24 151
Houston 8 24 153
12. USF 8 35 180
 
FIRST DOWNS G Rush Pass Pen Total Avg/G
1. SMU 8 71 102 32 205 25.6
2. ECU 8 59 112 31 202 25.2
3. UCF 8 92 89 18 199 24.9
4. Memphis 8 73 94 20 187 23.4
5. Tulane 8 102 77 7 186 23.2
6. Navy 8 148 24 10 182 22.8
7. Tulsa 8 65 95 20 180 22.5
8. Temple 8 57 91 13 161 20.1
9. Houston 8 69 68 12 149 18.6
10. UConn 8 58 78 12 148 18.5
Cincinnati 8 78 57 13 148 18.5
12. USF 8 73 58 14 145 18.1
 
OPPONENT 1ST DOWNS G Rush Pass Pen Total Avg/G
1. Navy 8 55 68 9 132 16.5
2. Tulsa 8 73 69 18 160 20.0
3. UCF 8 75 70 17 162 20.2
4. Memphis 8 70 77 18 165 20.6
5. Tulane 8 79 76 13 168 21.0
Houston 8 72 81 15 168 21.0
7. Cincinnati 8 67 85 23 175 21.9
8. Temple 8 77 76 25 178 22.2
9. USF 8 107 60 17 184 23.0
10. SMU 8 67 104 17 188 23.5
11. UConn 8 103 82 17 202 25.2
12. ECU 8 100 97 13 210 26.2
 
3RD-DOWN CONVERSIONS G Conv. Att. Pct.
1. Memphis 8 52 103 50.5
2. Navy 8 48 105 45.7
3. Tulsa 8 58 134 43.3
4. Cincinnati 8 51 118 43.2
5. SMU 8 56 134 41.8
6. UCF 8 52 126 41.3
7. USF 8 49 120 40.8
8. ECU 8 47 118 39.8
9. Tulane 8 45 115 39.1
10. Temple 8 47 124 37.9
11. Houston 8 34 106 32.1
12. UConn 8 29 113 25.7
 
OPP 3RD-DN CONVERT G Conv. Att. Pct.
1. UCF 8 36 128 28.1
2. Navy 8 39 111 35.1
3. Tulsa 8 41 116 35.3
4. Tulane 8 47 119 39.5
5. Temple 8 52 129 40.3
6. SMU 8 54 133 40.6
7. Cincinnati 8 53 128 41.4
8. Houston 8 44 106 41.5
9. Memphis 8 53 127 41.7
10. ECU 8 51 112 45.5
11. USF 8 54 118 45.8
12. UConn 8 44 89 49.4
 
4TH-DOWN CONVERSIONS G Conv. Att. Pct.
1. SMU 8 19 24 79.2
2. Houston 8 11 14 78.6
3. Navy 8 17 24 70.8
4. Tulane 8 17 28 60.7
5. Tulsa 8 8 14 57.1
UCF 8 12 21 57.1
7. Memphis 8 7 13 53.8
8. ECU 8 3 6 50.0
Cincinnati 8 3 6 50.0
10. UConn 8 8 19 42.1
11. USF 8 5 12 41.7
12. Temple 8 6 18 33.3
 
OPP 4TH-DN CONVERT G Conv. Att. Pct.
1. Cincinnati 8 4 12 33.3
2. UConn 8 5 11 45.5
3. SMU 8 10 21 47.6
4. Temple 8 11 21 52.4
5. Navy 8 8 14 57.1
6. Houston 8 7 12 58.3
7. Memphis 8 10 17 58.8
8. UCF 8 12 20 60.0
9. USF 8 8 13 61.5
10. Tulane 8 12 18 66.7
11. ECU 8 13 19 68.4
12. Tulsa 8 16 21 76.2
 
PENALTIES G No. Yards Avg/G
1. Navy 8 34 292 36.5
2. Houston 8 36 364 45.5
3. ECU 8 44 393 49.1
4. UConn 8 51 411 51.4
5. Memphis 8 56 465 58.1
6. Temple 8 54 481 60.1
7. SMU 8 53 486 60.8
8. Tulane 8 61 531 66.4
9. Tulsa 8 66 565 70.6
10. Cincinnati 8 70 571 71.4
11. USF 8 67 592 74.0
12. UCF 8 74 593 74.1
 
OPPONENT PENALTIES G No. Yards Avg/G
1. ECU 8 78 675 84.4
2. SMU 8 67 654 81.8
3. Tulsa 8 67 579 72.4
4. USF 8 61 550 68.8
5. Memphis 8 56 512 64.0
6. UCF 8 61 504 63.0
7. Cincinnati 8 59 482 60.2
8. Houston 8 56 445 55.6
9. UConn 8 39 351 43.9
10. Navy 8 43 338 42.2
11. Tulane 8 39 327 40.9
Temple 8 40 327 40.9
 
TIME OF POSSESSION G Poss. Time Avg/G
1. Navy 8 266:40 33:20
2. UConn 8 265:43 33:12
3. Houston 8 252:56 31:37
4. Tulsa 8 242:55 30:21
5. Tulane 8 240:26 30:03
6. Cincinnati 8 238:09 29:46
7. Temple 8 237:08 29:38
8. Memphis 8 236:03 29:30
9. ECU 8 234:07 29:15
10. USF 8 233:55 29:14
11. SMU 8 225:05 28:08
12. UCF 8 206:27 25:48
 
Gained Lost
TURNOVER MARGIN G Fumb Int Total Fumb Int Total Margin Per/G
1. Cincinnati 8 6 13 19 5 7 12 +7 0.88
Navy 8 5 10 15 4 4 8 +7 0.88
3. Temple 8 8 5 13 4 5 9 +4 0.50
4. SMU 8 6 6 12 3 6 9 +3 0.38
5. UCF 8 4 9 13 6 5 11 +2 0.25
6. ECU 8 6 6 12 5 6 11 +1 0.12
7. USF 8 4 8 12 5 7 12 +0 0.00
Memphis 8 5 6 11 6 5 11 +0 0.00
9. Tulsa 8 10 4 14 7 8 15 -1 -0.12
10. Houston 8 4 6 10 6 11 17 -7 -0.88
Tulane 8 1 5 6 5 8 13 -7 -0.88
12. UConn 8 2 4 6 5 10 15 -9 -1.12
 
Red Zone Touchdowns Field Goals Lost possession
RED ZONE OFFENSE G Scores-Chances  Pct. TDs Rush-Pass Made-Att Fumb Int. Downs Other
1. Navy 8 28-28 100.0 25 23-2 3-3 0 0 0 0
2. Cincinnati 8 31-35 88.6 23 15-8 8-10 0 0 2 0
3. Tulane 8 25-30 83.3 21 16-5 4-6 0 0 2 1
4. UCF 8 28-34 82.4 21 12-9 7-8 0 2 3 0
ECU 8 28-34 82.4 16 7-9 12-13 1 2 2 0
6. Memphis 8 27-33 81.8 20 10-10 7-8 2 1 2 0
7. Houston 8 22-27 81.5 10 7-3 12-14 0 2 0 1
8. Tulsa 8 30-37 81.1 19 10-9 11-14 0 1 3 0
9. USF 8 19-24 79.2 15 7-8 4-7 0 2 0 0
10. SMU 8 32-42 76.2 25 12-13 7-8 1 2 4 2
11. Temple 8 24-32 75.0 18 9-9 6-7 2 0 4 1
12. UConn 8 13-20 65.0 11 3-8 2-2 1 2 4 0
 
Red Zone Touchdowns Field Goals Lost possession
RED ZONE DEFENSE G Scores-Chances  Pct. TDs Rush-Pass Made-Att Fumb Int. Downs Other
1. USF 8 21-30 70.0 17 12-5 4-5 1 2 4 1
2. Navy 8 17-24 70.8 13 6-7 4-7 2 0 2 0
3. Cincinnati 8 25-34 73.5 12 5-7 13-16 0 3 3 0
4. Temple 8 20-27 74.1 17 7-10 3-6 1 1 1 1
5. Tulsa 8 25-33 75.8 20 17-3 5-7 1 0 3 2
6. SMU 8 20-25 80.0 11 6-5 9-10 0 2 2 0
7. Tulane 8 29-35 82.9 15 6-9 14-15 0 1 3 1
8. ECU 8 31-36 86.1 26 17-9 5-5 1 2 2 0
9. UCF 8 27-31 87.1 18 9-9 9-10 0 3 0 0
10. Memphis 8 28-31 90.3 18 11-7 10-11 1 0 1 0
Houston 8 28-31 90.3 24 13-11 4-5 0 0 2 0
12. UConn 8 36-39 92.3 33 22-11 3-3 0 0 3 0
 
ON-SIDE KICKS BY G On-side Pct.
1. Tulane 8 1-2 50.0
2. ECU 8 1-3 33.3
3. SMU 8 0-4 0.0
Memphis 8 0-2 0.0
Houston 8 0-1 0.0
UConn 8 0-1 0.0
Tulsa 8 0-0 0.0
Temple 8 0-0 0.0
UCF 8 0-0 0.0
Cincinnati 8 0-0 0.0
Navy 8 0-0 0.0
USF 8 0-0 0.0
 
ON-SIDE KICKS AGAINST G On-side Pct.
1. SMU 8 0-3 0.0
Memphis 8 0-2 0.0
Navy 8 0-1 0.0
Tulsa 8 0-1 0.0
USF 8 0-1 0.0
Tulane 8 0-1 0.0
UConn 8 0-0 0.0
ECU 8 0-0 0.0
Houston 8 0-0 0.0
Cincinnati 8 0-0 0.0
11. UCF 8 1-3 33.3
12. Temple 8 1-1 100.0
 
ATTENDANCE Home Avg   Away Avg   Neutral Avg   Total attend Avg
Cincinnati 4-142350 35588   4-123573 30893   0-0 0   8-265923 33240
ECU 4-126592 31648   4-115225 28806   0-0 0   8-241817 30227
Houston 4-98232 24558   4-98273 24568   0-0 0   8-196505 24563
Memphis 4-160108 40027   4-101721 25430   0-0 0   8-261829 32729
Navy 4-125331 31333   4-91343 22836   0-0 0   8-216674 27084
SMU 4-101563 25391   4-146631 36658   0-0 0   8-248194 31024
Temple 4-118135 29534   4-112700 28175   0-0 0   8-230835 28854
Tulane 4-86521 21630   4-109950 27488   0-0 0   8-196471 24559
Tulsa 4-67585 16896   4-116746 29186   0-0 0   8-184331 23041
UCF 4-173647 43412   4-107433 26858   0-0 0   8-281080 35135
UConn 4-66541 16635   4-126206 31552   0-0 0   8-192747 24093
USF 4-109312 27328   4-126116 31529   0-0 0   8-235428 29428
Totals 48-1375917 28665   48-1375917 28665   0-0 0   96-2751834 28665  
 
 

Individual Statistics

 

RUSHING Cl G Att. Yards Avg. TD Long Avg/G
1. PERRY, Malcolm-NAVY SR 8 180 1244 6.9 16 70 155.5
2. JONES, Xavier-SMU SR 8 159 879 5.5 13 64 109.9
3. GAINWELL, Kenneth-MEM FR 8 142 865 6.1 7 75 108.1
4. WARREN, Michael-CIN JR 8 156 799 5.1 8 60 99.9
5. CAROTHERS, J-NAVY SO 6 65 596 9.2 13 75 99.3
6. BROOKS, Shamari-TLS JR 8 146 767 5.3 2 64 95.9
7. MENSAH, Kevin-UCONN JR 8 147 644 4.4 2 58 80.5
8. CRONKRITE, Jordan-USF SR 6 85 482 5.7 2 39 80.3
9. DAVIS,Re'Mahn-TEM FR 7 118 554 4.7 4 55 79.1
10. McMILLAN, Justin-TLN SR 8 117 531 4.5 8 41 66.4
 
PASSING AVG/GAME Cl G Comp-Att-Int Pct. Yards TD Long Avg/G
1. AHLERS, Holton-ECU SO 8 196 - 319 - 6 61.4 2612 17 75 326.5
2. BUECHELE, Shane-SMU JR 8 192 - 311 - 5 61.7 2467 26 75 308.4
3. WHITE, Brady-MEM JR 8 152 - 235 - 5 64.7 2340 24 73 292.5
4. GABRIEL, Dillon-UCF FR 8 159 - 270 - 5 58.9 2336 16 74 292.0
5. SMITH, Zach-TLS JR 8 167 - 295 - 8 56.6 2261 14 66 282.6
6. TUNE, Clayton-HOU SO 6 90 - 159 - 9 56.6 1409 10 96 234.8
7. RUSSO,Anthony-TEM JR 8 148 - 248 - 5 59.7 1662 11 75 207.8
8. McMILLAN, Justin-TLN SR 8 118 - 208 - 8 56.7 1604 11 53 200.5
9. ZERGIOTIS, Jack-UCONN FR 7 97 - 174 - 7 55.7 1219 8 94 174.1
10. RIDDER, Desmond-CIN SO 7 86 - 167 - 5 51.5 1021 9 75 145.9
 
PASS EFFICIENCY Cl G Comp-Att-Int Pct. Yards TD Long Effic.
1. WHITE, Brady-MEM JR 8 152 - 235 - 5 64.7 2340 24 73 177.8
2. BUECHELE, Shane-SMU JR 8 192 - 311 - 5 61.7 2467 26 75 152.7
3. GABRIEL, Dillon-UCF FR 8 159 - 270 - 5 58.9 2336 16 74 147.4
4. AHLERS, Holton-ECU SO 8 196 - 319 - 6 61.4 2612 17 75 144.0
5. TUNE, Clayton-HOU SO 6 90 - 159 - 9 56.6 1409 10 96 140.5
6. McMILLAN, Justin-TLN SR 8 118 - 208 - 8 56.7 1604 11 53 131.3
7. SMITH, Zach-TLS JR 8 167 - 295 - 8 56.6 2261 14 66 131.2
8. RUSSO,Anthony-TEM JR 8 148 - 248 - 5 59.7 1662 11 75 126.6
9. ZERGIOTIS, Jack-UCONN FR 7 97 - 174 - 7 55.7 1219 8 94 121.7
10. RIDDER, Desmond-CIN SO 7 86 - 167 - 5 51.5 1021 9 75 114.6
 
RECEPTIONS/GAME Cl G Rec. Yards TD Long Avg/C Avg/G Rec/G
1. PROCHE, James-SMU SR 8 75 859 11 52 11.5 107.4 9.4
2. BLUE,Jadan-TEM SO 8 60 573 2 36 9.6 71.6 7.5
3. SNEAD, Tyler-ECU FR 8 58 671 5 57 11.6 83.9 7.2
4. DAVIS, Gabriel-UCF JR 8 52 861 7 73 16.6 107.6 6.5
5. JOHNSON, C.J.-ECU FR 8 45 817 4 75 18.2 102.1 5.6
6. ROSS, Cameron-UCONN FR 8 44 488 3 94 11.1 61.0 5.5
7. STOKES, Keylon-TLS JR 8 43 738 4 62 17.2 92.2 5.4
8. COXIE, Damonte-MEM JR 8 41 719 8 59 17.5 89.9 5.1
9. MACK,Branden-TEM JR 8 39 658 5 75 16.9 82.2 4.9
10. WILLIAMS, Marlon-UCF JR 8 37 472 4 73 12.8 59.0 4.6
 
RECEIVE YDS/GAME Cl G Rec. Yards TD Long Rec/G Avg/C Avg/G
1. DAVIS, Gabriel-UCF JR 8 52 861 7 73 6.5 16.6 107.6
2. PROCHE, James-SMU SR 8 75 859 11 52 9.4 11.5 107.4
3. JOHNSON, C.J.-ECU FR 8 45 817 4 75 5.6 18.2 102.1
4. STOKES, Keylon-TLS JR 8 43 738 4 62 5.4 17.2 92.2
5. COXIE, Damonte-MEM JR 8 41 719 8 59 5.1 17.5 89.9
6. STEVENSON, Marq-HOU JR 8 30 704 7 96 3.8 23.5 88.0
7. SNEAD, Tyler-ECU FR 8 58 671 5 57 7.2 11.6 83.9
8. MACK,Branden-TEM JR 8 39 658 5 75 4.9 16.9 82.2
9. BLUE,Jadan-TEM SO 8 60 573 2 36 7.5 9.6 71.6
10. NIXON, Tre-UCF JR 8 29 491 5 53 3.6 16.9 61.4
 
TOTAL OFFENSE Cl G Rush Pass Plays Total Yds/G
1. AHLERS, Holton-ECU SO 8 209 2612 386 2821 352.6
2. BUECHELE, Shane-SMU JR 8 42 2467 355 2509 313.6
3. GABRIEL, Dillon-UCF FR 8 85 2336 325 2421 302.6
4. WHITE, Brady-MEM JR 8 -17 2340 269 2323 290.4
5. SMITH, Zach-TLS JR 8 -28 2261 343 2233 279.1
6. McMILLAN, Justin-TLN SR 8 531 1604 325 2135 266.9
7. TUNE, Clayton-HOU SO 6 144 1409 216 1553 258.8
8. PERRY, Malcolm-NAVY SR 8 1244 744 236 1988 248.5
9. RUSSO,Anthony-TEM JR 8 -30 1662 266 1632 204.0
10. RIDDER, Desmond-CIN SO 7 344 1021 239 1365 195.0
 
SCORING Cl G TD FG XPT 2XP Pts Pts/G
1. CAROTHERS, J-NAVY SO 6 14 0 0 0 84 14.0
2. PERRY, Malcolm-NAVY SR 8 16 0 0 0 96 12.0
3. JONES, Xavier-SMU SR 8 14 0 0 0 84 10.5
4. PATTERSON, Riley-MEM JR 8 0 9 43 0 70 8.8
5. VERITY, Jake-ECU JR 8 0 15 23 0 68 8.5
6. WITHERSPOON, Da-HOU JR 8 0 14 24 0 66 8.2
PROCHE, James-SMU SR 8 11 0 0 0 66 8.2
8. BARNAS, Dylan-UCF SR 8 0 8 40 0 64 8.0
9. RAINEY, Jacob-TLS FR 8 0 12 26 0 62 7.8
10. NICHOLS, Bijan-NAVY FR 8 0 6 43 0 61 7.6
 
SCORING (TDs) Cl G TD Rush Pass Ret. PAT Pts Pts/G
1. CAROTHERS, J-NAVY SO 6 14 13 1 0 0 84 14.0
2. PERRY, Malcolm-NAVY SR 8 16 16 0 0 0 96 12.0
3. JONES, Xavier-SMU SR 8 14 13 1 0 0 84 10.5
4. PROCHE, James-SMU SR 8 11 0 11 0 0 66 8.2
5. WARREN, Michael-CIN JR 8 9 8 1 0 0 54 6.8
GAINWELL, Kenneth-MEM FR 8 9 7 2 0 0 54 6.8
7. COXIE, Damonte-MEM JR 8 8 0 8 0 0 48 6.0
STEVENSON, Marq-HOU JR 8 8 0 7 1 0 48 6.0
GIBSON, Antonio-MEM SR 8 8 3 4 1 0 48 6.0
McMILLAN, Justin-TLN SR 8 8 8 0 0 0 48 6.0
 
SCORING (KICK) Cl G PATs FGs Pts Pts/G
1. PATTERSON, Riley-MEM JR 8 43-43 9-11 70 8.8
2. VERITY, Jake-ECU JR 8 23-23 15-17 68 8.5
3. WITHERSPOON, Da-HOU JR 8 24-24 14-17 66 8.2
4. BARNAS, Dylan-UCF SR 8 40-40 8-9 64 8.0
5. RAINEY, Jacob-TLS FR 8 26-27 12-19 62 7.8
6. NICHOLS, Bijan-NAVY FR 8 43-44 6-8 61 7.6
7. CROSA, Sam-CIN SR 8 28-28 10-13 58 7.2
8. ROBLEDO, Kevin-SMU SR 8 35-36 7-8 56 7.0
9. GLOVER, M.-TLN JR 8 31-31 7-11 52 6.5
10. MOBLEY,Will-TEM FR 8 24-26 9-10 51 6.4
 
PUNT RETURN AVG Cl G No. Yards TD Long Avg.
1. PROCHE, James-SMU SR 8 11 122 0 20 11.1
2. SAMUEL, Traveon-MEM SR 8 11 107 0 21 9.7
3. ANDERSON, Otis-UCF JR 8 10 91 0 36 9.1
4. MONTGOMERY, Ryan-CIN FR 8 15 132 0 20 8.8
5. WINN, Garrett-NAVY JR 8 12 96 0 17 8.0
6. SMITH, Bryson-HOU SO 6 8 19 0 12 2.4
 
KICK RETURN AVG Cl G No. Yards TD Long Avg.
1. GIBSON, Antonio-MEM SR 8 11 363 1 97 33.0
2. CLAYBROOKS, Chris-MEM JR 7 11 338 1 94 30.7
3. SANDERS, CJ-SMU SR 8 19 544 1 100 28.6
4. TUCKER, Tre-CIN FR 8 13 317 0 43 24.4
5. STEVENSON, Marq-HOU JR 8 15 361 1 94 24.1
6. THOMPKINS, Art-UCONN SR 8 29 623 0 33 21.5
7. JONES, Amare-TLN SO 8 25 501 0 44 20.0
8. WRIGHT,Isaiah-TEM SR 8 19 379 0 55 19.9
9. SANDERS, Bentlee-USF SO 8 11 213 0 67 19.4
10. STOKES, Keylon-TLS JR 8 14 262 0 41 18.7
 
ALL PURPOSE Cl G Rush Rcv PR KR Yards Yards/G
1. PERRY, Malcolm-NAVY SR 8 1244 0 0 0 1244 155.5
2. GAINWELL, Kenneth-MEM FR 8 865 362 0 0 1227 153.4
3. STEVENSON, Marq-HOU JR 8 60 704 0 361 1125 140.6
4. SNEAD, Tyler-ECU FR 8 -7 671 27 393 1084 135.5
5. GIBSON, Antonio-MEM SR 8 224 473 0 363 1060 132.5
6. STOKES, Keylon-TLS JR 8 39 738 9 262 1048 131.0
7. THOMPKINS, Art-UCONN SR 8 208 190 0 623 1021 127.6
8. PROCHE, James-SMU SR 8 18 859 122 16 1015 126.9
9. CAROTHERS, J-NAVY SO 6 596 104 0 0 700 116.7
10. JONES, Xavier-SMU SR 8 879 50 0 0 929 116.1
 
PUNTING Cl G No. Yards Long Avg.
1. ROY, Dane-HOU SR 8 37 1748 61 47.2
2. SCHNEIDER, Trent-USF JR 8 46 2059 65 44.8
3. SMITH, James-CIN JR 8 42 1804 59 43.0
4. BENNETT, Thomas-TLS SR 8 37 1572 62 42.5
5. MAGLIOZZI, Luke-UCONN JR 8 47 1976 61 42.0
6. OSTEEN, Andrew-UCF FR 8 36 1493 67 41.5
7. YOUNG, Jonn-ECU JR 8 45 1792 62 39.8
8. BARRY,Adam-TEM SO 8 42 1638 56 39.0
9. DENBOW, Trevor-SMU JR 8 32 1237 72 38.7
 
FIELD GOALS Cl G Made Att. Pct. Made/G
1. VERITY, Jake-ECU JR 8 15 17 88.2 1.88
2. WITHERSPOON, Da-HOU JR 8 14 17 82.4 1.75
3. RAINEY, Jacob-TLS FR 8 12 19 63.2 1.50
4. CROSA, Sam-CIN SR 8 10 13 76.9 1.25
5. MOBLEY,Will-TEM FR 8 9 10 90.0 1.12
PATTERSON, Riley-MEM JR 8 9 11 81.8 1.12
7. BARNAS, Dylan-UCF SR 8 8 9 88.9 1.00
8. ROBLEDO, Kevin-SMU SR 8 7 8 87.5 0.88
GLOVER, M.-TLN JR 8 7 11 63.6 0.88
10. NICHOLS, Bijan-NAVY FR 8 6 8 75.0 0.75
 
FIELD GOAL PCT Cl G Made Att. Long Pct.
1. MOBLEY,Will-TEM FR 8 9 10 44 90.0
2. BARNAS, Dylan-UCF SR 8 8 9 50 88.9
3. VERITY, Jake-ECU JR 8 15 17 51 88.2
4. ROBLEDO, Kevin-SMU SR 8 7 8 33 87.5
5. WITHERSPOON, Da-HOU JR 8 14 17 45 82.4
6. PATTERSON, Riley-MEM JR 8 9 11 50 81.8
7. CROSA, Sam-CIN SR 8 10 13 41 76.9
8. NICHOLS, Bijan-NAVY FR 8 6 8 49 75.0
9. GLOVER, M.-TLN JR 8 7 11 44 63.6
10. RAINEY, Jacob-TLS FR 8 12 19 41 63.2
 
PAT KICKING PCT Cl G Made Att. Pct.
1. PATTERSON, Riley-MEM JR 8 43 43 100.0
BARNAS, Dylan-UCF SR 8 40 40 100.0
3. NICHOLS, Bijan-NAVY FR 8 43 44 97.7
4. ROBLEDO, Kevin-SMU SR 8 35 36 97.2
 
TACKLES (All positions) Cl G Pos. Solo Ast. Total Avg/G Sacks
1. EVANS, Nate-UCF SR 8 LB 48 27 75 9.4 0.0
2. EDMISTON, Cooper-TLS SR 8 32 40 72 9.0 1.0
3. COLLINS, Zaven-TLS SO 8 40 31 71 8.9 2.0
4. COYLE, Tyler-UCONN SR 7 DB 42 20 62 8.9 0.0
5. MCBRYDE, Richard-SMU SR 8 LB 50 17 67 8.4 2.5
6. KING, Robert-UCONN JR 6 DB 29 21 50 8.3 0.0
7. FORREST, Darrick-CIN JR 8 35 31 66 8.2 0.0
WRIGHT, Bryan-CIN SR 8 30 36 66 8.2 1.5
9. ROBINSON, Delano-SMU JR 7 LB 33 18 51 7.3 1.0
10. STUARD, Grant-HOU JR 8 33 25 58 7.2 0.0
11. KUERSCHEN, C.-TLN JR 7 41 9 50 7.1 0.0
12. ROBINSON, Davondre-ECU JR 8 DB 34 22 56 7.0 0.0
13. SMITH, Xavier-ECU SO 8 LB 27 28 55 6.9 0.0
BRADLEY,Shaun-TEM SR 8 40 15 55 6.9 0.0
15. BOYLES, Dwayne-USF SO 8 32 22 54 6.8 2.0
WILLIAMS, Damar-HOU JR 8 40 14 54 6.8 0.0
FAGOT, Diego-NAVY SO 8 28 26 54 6.8 2.5
BRENNAN, Kevin-NAVY SO 8 25 29 54 6.8 0.0
19. CLEMONS, Rodney-SMU SR 8 DB 37 16 53 6.6 0.0
YOUNG, Perry-CIN SR 8 26 27 53 6.6 1.0
21. GILYARD, Eriq-UCF SO 8 LB 28 24 52 6.5 0.0
COLLIER, Antwan-UCF JR 8 DB 35 17 52 6.5 1.0
MACON, Patrick-USF SR 6 22 17 39 6.5 1.0
24. HALL, Austin-MEM SR 7 LB 28 17 45 6.4 1.0
25. NELSON, Patrick-SMU SR 8 LB 39 12 51 6.4 6.5
MITCHELL, Jackson-UCONN FR 8 LB 25 26 51 6.4 0.5
STUDSTILL, Devin-USF SR 8 30 21 51 6.4 0.0
28. GRANT, Richie-UCF JR 7 DB 28 16 44 6.3 0.0
29. GRIER, Antonio-USF SO 8 30 20 50 6.2 2.0
30. CULLENS, Xavier-MEM SO 7 LB 28 15 43 6.1 0.0
31. MITCHELL, Eric-UCF JR 8 LB 25 24 49 6.1 2.0
32. GRAHAM, L.-TLN SR 8 LB 30 17 47 5.9 1.5
33. RUSSELL,Chapelle-TEM SR 8 30 16 46 5.8 0.0
34. OWENS, Gervarri-HOU SO 8 31 13 44 5.5 0.5
TYLER,Amir-TEM JR 8 35 9 44 5.5 0.0
STRINGER, Gerard-ECU SO 8 LB 25 19 44 5.5 1.0
HALL, P.J.-TLN SR 8 35 9 44 5.5 0.0
38. FRANKLIN,Sam-TEM SR 8 33 10 43 5.4 1.0
DENBOW, Trevor-SMU JR 8 LB 25 18 43 5.4 0.5
FORTT, Omar-UCONN JR 8 LB 26 17 43 5.4 1.5
41. GORE, Colby-ECU SR 8 DB 35 7 42 5.2 0.0
42. MUTIN, Donavan-HOU SO 8 22 19 41 5.1 0.0
JOHNSON, Brandon-TLS SR 8 25 16 41 5.1 0.0
44. WHITE, Jarell-CIN JR 8 25 15 40 5.0 1.0
FUTRELL, Kendall-ECU SR 8 DL 23 17 40 5.0 7.0
REAVES, Greg-USF SR 8 21 19 40 5.0 2.0
ROBERTS, Nick-USF SO 8 23 17 40 5.0 2.0
ANDERSON, Deont-HOU JR 7 28 7 35 5.0 0.0
49. HAND,Harrison-TEM JR 8 31 8 39 4.9 0.0
JOHNSON, Quindell-MEM FR 8 DB 32 7 39 4.9 0.0
 
SACKS Cl G Pos. Solo Ast. Yards Total Avg/G
1. ROCHE,Quincy-TEM JR 8 10 2 77 11.0 1.38
2. SCOTT, Delontae-SMU SR 8 DE 7 1 50 7.5 0.94
3. FUTRELL, Kendall-ECU SR 8 DL 7 0 38 7.0 0.88
4. NELSON, Patrick-SMU SR 8 LB 6 1 40 6.5 0.81
5. SPRINGER, Jacob-NAVY JR 8 6 0 43 6.0 0.75
6. HAYES, Brendon-UCF SR 8 DL 4 1 30 5.5 0.69
7. HUFF, Bryce-MEM SR 8 DE 4 2 39 5.0 0.62
GIPSON, Trevis-TLS SR 8 5 0 31 5.0 0.62
9. LEVINE,Dana-TEM SR 8 4 1 24 4.5 0.56
10. TURNIER, Kenny-UCF JR 8 DL 3 1 19 3.5 0.44
GARY, Demerick-SMU SR 8 DT 3 1 16 3.5 0.44
12. JONES, Kevon-UCONN SO 6 DL 2 2 28 3.0 0.50
13. DAVIS, Kalia-UCF SO 8 DL 3 0 25 3.0 0.38
SANDERS, Myjai-CIN SO 8 2 2 21 3.0 0.38
15. CHAMBERS, Isaia-HOU JR 6 2 2 19 3.0 0.50
16. CAROTHERS, Paul-NAVY SR 8 2 2 15 3.0 0.38
ANENIH, David-HOU JR 8 2 2 14 3.0 0.38
MESDAY,Zack-TEM SR 8 3 0 8 3.0 0.38
19. MAIJEH,Ifeanyi-TEM SO 7 2 1 28 2.5 0.36
20. FAGOT, Diego-NAVY SO 8 2 1 19 2.5 0.31
 
TACKLES FOR LOSS Cl G Pos. Solo Ast. Yards Total Avg/G
1. ROCHE,Quincy-TEM JR 8 15 2 94 16.0 2.00
2. NELSON, Patrick-SMU SR 8 LB 9 5 63 11.5 1.44
SPRINGER, Jacob-NAVY JR 8 10 3 64 11.5 1.44
4. HUFF, Bryce-MEM SR 8 DE 9 4 58 11.0 1.38
5. SCOTT, Delontae-SMU SR 8 DE 9 3 59 10.5 1.31
6. TURNIER, Kenny-UCF JR 8 DL 6 7 33 9.5 1.19
FUTRELL, Kendall-ECU SR 8 DL 9 1 44 9.5 1.19
8. MCBRYDE, Richard-SMU SR 8 LB 8 1 28 8.5 1.06
GIPSON, Trevis-TLS SR 8 8 1 41 8.5 1.06
10. LEVINE,Dana-TEM SR 8 7 2 37 8.0 1.00
MITCHELL, Eric-UCF JR 8 LB 7 2 32 8.0 1.00
12. DORCEUS, Joseph-MEM JR 8 DL 6 3 20 7.5 0.94
BOYLES, Dwayne-USF SO 8 7 1 26 7.5 0.94
YOUNG, Perry-CIN SR 8 6 3 17 7.5 0.94
EVANS, Nate-UCF SR 8 LB 4 7 16 7.5 0.94
16. COLLINS, Zaven-TLS SO 8 6 2 26 7.0 0.88
17. REAVES, Greg-USF SR 8 6 1 22 6.5 0.81
CAROTHERS, Paul-NAVY SR 8 5 3 21 6.5 0.81
19. HALL, Austin-MEM SR 7 LB 5 3 11 6.5 0.93
20. DAVIS, Kalia-UCF SO 8 DL 5 2 31 6.0 0.75
 
PASSES DEFENDED Cl G BrUp Int. Total Avg/G
1. ROBINSON II, Reggie-TLS SR 8 10 3 13 1.62
2. JOHNSON, Ar'mani-SMU SO 7 8 2 10 1.43
3. COYLE, Tyler-UCONN SR 7 8 0 8 1.14
4. CLEMONS, Rodney-SMU SR 8 6 3 9 1.12
5. CLARKE, Nevelle-UCF SR 7 5 2 7 1.00
GARDNER, Ahmad-CIN FR 8 5 3 8 1.00
BRASWELL,Christian-TEM FR 7 7 0 7 1.00
HALL, P.J.-TLN SR 8 7 1 8 1.00
9. McMILLIAN, Ja'Quan-ECU FR 8 6 1 7 0.88
ROBINSON, Aaron-UCF JR 8 5 2 7 0.88
BRYANT, Coby-CIN JR 8 6 1 7 0.88
MCMORRIS, M-NAVY SO 8 6 1 7 0.88
13. ANDERSON, Deont-HOU JR 7 6 0 6 0.86
14. HAMPTON, Mike-USF JR 8 6 0 6 0.75
LEWIS, Shaun-HOU SO 8 6 0 6 0.75
TYLER,Amir-TEM JR 8 6 0 6 0.75
HAND,Harrison-TEM JR 8 4 2 6 0.75
CARTER, TJ-MEM JR 8 6 0 6 0.75
MONROE, J.-TLN JR 8 4 2 6 0.75
20. GOWAN, Tay-UCF JR 7 4 1 5 0.71
 
INTERCEPTIONS Cl G No. Yards TD Long Avg/G
1. GARDNER, Ahmad-CIN FR 8 3 78 2 62 0.38
FORREST, Darrick-CIN JR 8 3 51 0 38 0.38
COLLIER, Antwan-UCF JR 8 3 46 0 20 0.38
ROBINSON II, Reggie-TLS SR 8 3 33 0 24 0.38
HICKS, Ja'Von-CIN SO 8 3 22 0 22 0.38
CLEMONS, Rodney-SMU SR 8 3 0 0 0 0.38
7. JOHNSON, Ar'mani-SMU SO 7 2 64 1 64 0.29
CLARKE, Nevelle-UCF SR 7 2 48 1 48 0.29
9. SAILS, KJ-USF JR 8 2 62 0 40 0.25
WILLIAMS, Damar-HOU JR 8 2 36 1 25 0.25
 
FUMBLES FORCED Cl G No. Avg/G
1. SPRINGER, Jacob-NAVY JR 8 3 0.38
FUTRELL, Kendall-ECU SR 8 3 0.38
WHITE, Jarell-CIN JR 8 3 0.38
4. GIPSON, Trevis-TLS SR 8 2 0.25
SCOTT, Delontae-SMU SR 8 2 0.25
HUFF, Bryce-MEM SR 8 2 0.25
KELLY,DeAndre-TEM SR 8 2 0.25
8. EATHERLY, G.-TLN SR 6 1 0.17
MACON, Patrick-USF SR 6 1 0.17
BRYANT, Larry-TLN SR 6 1 0.17
 
FUMBLES RECOVERED Cl G No. Avg/G
1. RAY, Kendarin-TLS FR 8 3 0.38
HICKS, Ja'Von-CIN SO 8 3 0.38
3. ROCHE,Quincy-TEM JR 8 2 0.25
FRANKLIN,Sam-TEM SR 8 2 0.25
MOORE, Jordan-HOU FR 8 2 0.25
6. HENLEY, Leroy-ECU SO 6 1 0.17
KIRVEN, Zamar-HOU SO 6 1 0.17
8. MORGAN, D.J.-UCONN SR 7 1 0.14
BRASWELL,Christian-TEM FR 7 1 0.14
ROBINSON, Delano-SMU JR 7 1 0.14