American Athletic Conference Football

Leaders


 

Team Statistics

 

SCORING OFFENSE G TD FG XPT 2XP DXP Saf Points Avg/G
1. Memphis 8 53 6 52 0 0 0 388 48.5
2. UCF 8 49 6 47 0 0 0 359 44.9
3. USF 8 36 17 32 1 0 0 301 37.6
4. SMU 8 38 8 34 1 1 0 290 36.2
5. Tulane 8 32 7 27 1 0 0 242 30.2
6. Houston 8 30 7 30 0 0 0 231 28.9
7. Navy 8 30 5 26 1 0 2 227 28.4
8. ECU 8 27 9 26 0 0 0 215 26.9
9. UConn 8 26 10 22 1 0 0 210 26.2
10. Temple 8 25 12 21 1 0 0 209 26.1
11. Tulsa 8 25 7 25 0 1 0 198 24.8
12. Cincinnati 8 21 7 16 3 0 0 169 21.1
 
SCORING DEFENSE G TD FG XPT 2XP DXP Saf Points Avg/G
1. USF 8 25 4 24 0 0 0 186 23.2
2. UCF 8 25 5 20 1 0 0 187 23.4
3. Houston 8 25 11 24 0 0 0 207 25.9
4. Temple 8 25 14 24 0 1 0 218 27.2
5. Navy 8 29 9 24 3 1 0 233 29.1
6. Memphis 8 31 6 26 1 0 1 234 29.2
7. Tulane 8 33 3 31 0 0 1 240 30.0
8. Cincinnati 8 33 16 29 1 0 0 277 34.6
9. Tulsa 8 36 10 33 0 0 0 279 34.9
10. SMU 8 39 10 35 2 0 0 303 37.9
11. UConn 8 41 6 40 1 0 0 306 38.2
12. ECU 8 50 7 48 0 0 0 369 46.1
 
TOTAL OFFENSE G Rush Pass Plays Yards Avg/P TD Avg/G
1. Memphis 8 1570 2815 581 4385 7.5 49 548.1
2. UCF 8 1642 2613 560 4255 7.6 46 531.9
3. USF 8 2075 1953 640 4028 6.3 34 503.5
4. SMU 8 1453 2475 598 3928 6.6 37 491.0
5. ECU 8 925 2656 651 3581 5.5 27 447.6
6. Houston 8 1532 1971 557 3503 6.3 29 437.9
7. Navy 8 2658 766 572 3424 6.0 30 428.0
8. UConn 8 1093 2251 595 3344 5.6 25 418.0
9. Tulane 8 1789 1542 568 3331 5.9 31 416.4
10. Tulsa 8 1721 1390 548 3111 5.7 24 388.9
11. Temple 8 1132 1943 571 3075 5.4 22 384.4
12. Cincinnati 8 1182 1881 529 3063 5.8 21 382.9
 
TOTAL DEFENSE G Rush Pass Plays Yards Avg/P TD Avg/G
1. USF 8 1122 1676 585 2798 4.8 23 349.8
2. Temple 8 1411 1436 560 2847 5.1 24 355.9
3. Navy 8 1215 1909 498 3124 6.3 28 390.5
4. Houston 8 1163 2296 642 3459 5.4 23 432.4
5. UCF 8 1387 2118 608 3505 5.8 24 438.1
6. Memphis 8 1711 1827 632 3538 5.6 31 442.2
7. Tulane 8 1662 1906 523 3568 6.8 32 446.0
8. Cincinnati 8 1689 2069 593 3758 6.3 31 469.8
9. Tulsa 8 2002 1984 591 3986 6.7 35 498.2
10. SMU 8 2018 2064 584 4082 7.0 39 510.2
11. ECU 8 1936 2240 528 4176 7.9 44 522.0
12. UConn 8 1456 2731 626 4187 6.7 41 523.4
 
RUSHING OFFENSE G Att Yards Avg. TD Yards/G
1. Navy 8 503 2658 5.3 24 332.2
2. USF 8 397 2075 5.2 21 259.4
3. Tulane 8 392 1789 4.6 22 223.6
4. Tulsa 8 361 1721 4.8 19 215.1
5. UCF 8 305 1642 5.4 23 205.2
6. Memphis 8 270 1570 5.8 24 196.2
7. Houston 8 311 1532 4.9 19 191.5
8. SMU 8 279 1453 5.2 15 181.6
9. Cincinnati 8 251 1182 4.7 7 147.8
10. Temple 8 285 1132 4.0 8 141.5
11. UConn 8 326 1093 3.4 11 136.6
12. ECU 8 268 925 3.5 7 115.6
 
RUSHING DEFENSE G Att Yards Avg. TD Yards/G
1. USF 8 333 1122 3.4 13 140.2
2. Houston 8 325 1163 3.6 15 145.4
3. Navy 8 270 1215 4.5 11 151.9
4. UCF 8 302 1387 4.6 9 173.4
5. Temple 8 335 1411 4.2 9 176.4
6. UConn 8 307 1456 4.7 17 182.0
7. Tulane 8 297 1662 5.6 19 207.8
8. Cincinnati 8 353 1689 4.8 16 211.1
9. Memphis 8 366 1711 4.7 17 213.9
10. ECU 8 319 1936 6.1 26 242.0
11. Tulsa 8 373 2002 5.4 22 250.2
12. SMU 8 368 2018 5.5 26 252.2
 
PASS OFFENSE G Comp Att Int   Pct. Yards Avg. TD Avg/G
1. Memphis 8 201 311 6 64.6 2815 9.1 25 351.9
2. ECU 8 225 383 10 58.7 2656 6.9 20 332.0
3. UCF 8 171 255 5 67.1 2613 10.2 23 326.6
4. SMU 8 196 319 7 61.4 2475 7.8 22 309.4
5. UConn 8 174 269 6 64.7 2251 8.4 14 281.4
6. Houston 8 167 246 7 67.9 1971 8.0 10 246.4
7. USF 8 130 243 4 53.5 1953 8.0 13 244.1
8. Temple 8 160 286 15 55.9 1943 6.8 14 242.9
9. Cincinnati 8 167 278 5 60.1 1881 6.8 14 235.1
10. Tulane 8 105 176 4 59.7 1542 8.8 9 192.8
11. Tulsa 8 97 187 7 51.9 1390 7.4 5 173.8
12. Navy 8 31 69 8 44.9 766 11.1 6 95.8
 
PASS DEFENSE G Comp Att Int   Pct. Yards Avg. TD Avg/G
1. Temple 8 129 225 6 57.3 1436 6.4 15 179.5
2. USF 8 136 252 10 54.0 1676 6.7 10 209.5
3. Memphis 8 146 266 9 54.9 1827 6.9 14 228.4
4. Tulane 8 129 226 8 57.1 1906 8.4 13 238.2
5. Navy 8 147 228 4 64.5 1909 8.4 17 238.6
6. Tulsa 8 140 218 3 64.2 1984 9.1 13 248.0
7. SMU 8 136 216 8 63.0 2064 9.6 13 258.0
8. Cincinnati 8 156 240 3 65.0 2069 8.6 15 258.6
9. UCF 8 156 306 13 51.0 2118 6.9 15 264.8
10. ECU 8 135 209 5 64.6 2240 10.7 18 280.0
11. Houston 8 200 317 11 63.1 2296 7.2 8 287.0
12. UConn 8 214 319 4 67.1 2731 8.6 24 341.4
 
PASS EFFICIENCY G Comp Att Int   Pct. Yards TD Effic.
1. UCF 8 171 255 5 67.1 2613 23 179.0
2. Memphis 8 201 311 6 64.6 2815 25 163.3
3. UConn 8 174 269 6 64.7 2251 14 147.7
4. Tulane 8 105 176 4 59.7 1542 9 145.6
5. SMU 8 196 319 7 61.4 2475 22 145.0
6. Navy 8 31 69 8 44.9 766 6 143.7
7. Houston 8 167 246 7 67.9 1971 10 142.9
8. USF 8 130 243 4 53.5 1953 13 135.4
9. Cincinnati 8 167 278 5 60.1 1881 14 129.9
10. ECU 8 225 383 10 58.7 2656 20 129.0
11. Temple 8 160 286 15 55.9 1943 14 118.7
12. Tulsa 8 97 187 7 51.9 1390 5 115.6
 
PASS DEFENSE EFFIC. G Comp Att Int   Pct. Yards TD Effic.
1. USF 8 136 252 10 54.0 1676 10 115.0
2. UCF 8 156 306 13 51.0 2118 15 116.8
3. Memphis 8 146 266 9 54.9 1827 14 123.2
4. Houston 8 200 317 11 63.1 2296 8 125.3
5. Temple 8 129 225 6 57.3 1436 15 127.6
6. Tulane 8 129 226 8 57.1 1906 13 139.8
7. Cincinnati 8 156 240 3 65.0 2069 15 155.5
8. SMU 8 136 216 8 63.0 2064 13 155.7
9. Navy 8 147 228 4 64.5 1909 17 155.9
10. Tulsa 8 140 218 3 64.2 1984 13 157.6
11. UConn 8 214 319 4 67.1 2731 24 161.3
12. ECU 8 135 209 5 64.6 2240 18 178.3
 
KICKOFF RETURNS G No. Yards TD Avg.
1. UCF 8 15 463 1 30.9
2. Memphis 8 25 630 2 25.2
3. Temple 8 31 694 1 22.4
4. Cincinnati 8 25 537 0 21.5
5. UConn 8 33 705 0 21.4
6. Houston 8 23 482 0 21.0
7. Tulane 8 21 435 0 20.7
8. ECU 8 30 596 0 19.9
9. USF 8 20 397 0 19.9
10. Navy 8 27 531 0 19.7
11. Tulsa 8 29 556 0 19.2
12. SMU 8 27 515 0 19.1
 
PUNT RETURN AVG G No. Yards TD Avg.
1. UCF 8 10 168 1 16.8
2. Cincinnati 8 4 43 0 10.8
3. Temple 8 12 123 1 10.2
4. Navy 8 5 45 0 9.0
5. USF 8 17 132 0 7.8
6. UConn 8 6 38 0 6.3
7. Memphis 8 10 63 0 6.3
8. Houston 8 10 55 0 5.5
9. Tulane 8 5 24 0 4.8
10. SMU 8 3 11 0 3.7
11. Tulsa 8 3 4 0 1.3
12. ECU 8 4 -4 0 -1.0
 
INTERCEPTIONS G No. Yards TD Avg.
1. UCF 8 13 148 1 11.4
2. Houston 8 11 272 1 24.7
3. USF 8 10 158 2 15.8
4. Memphis 8 9 74 1 8.2
5. SMU 8 8 55 1 6.9
6. Tulane 8 8 63 0 7.9
7. Temple 8 6 148 0 24.7
8. ECU 8 5 50 0 10.0
UConn 8 4 40 1 10.0
10. Navy 8 4 29 0 7.2
11. Tulsa 8 3 92 0 30.7
12. Cincinnati 8 3 67 0 22.3
 
PUNTING G No. Yards Avg/P Ret. Avg. TB Net/P
1. Cincinnati 8 37 1608 43.5 40 1.1 0 42.4
2. UCF 8 28 1140 40.7 11 0.4 0 40.3
3. Navy 8 28 1170 41.8 63 2.2 0 39.5
4. Houston 8 37 1542 41.7 44 1.2 3 38.9
5. SMU 8 34 1391 40.9 38 1.1 3 38.0
6. Memphis 8 29 1156 39.9 14 0.5 2 38.0
7. USF 8 39 1652 42.4 65 1.7 7 37.1
8. ECU 8 35 1550 44.3 163 4.7 5 36.8
9. Tulsa 8 47 1927 41.0 159 3.4 3 36.3
10. Tulane 8 38 1433 37.7 14 0.4 2 36.3
11. UConn 8 40 1506 37.7 56 1.4 1 35.8
12. Temple 8 33 1264 38.3 35 1.1 4 34.8
 
KICKOFF COVERAGE G No. Yards Avg. Return TB Net Avg.
1. UCF 8 62 3739 60.3 798 16 41.0
2. Memphis 8 66 3963 60.0 768 20 40.8
3. Tulane 8 39 2343 60.1 330 17 40.7
4. Tulsa 8 39 2470 63.3 443 18 40.4
5. Navy 8 38 2317 61.0 509 12 39.7
6. UConn 8 42 2673 63.6 348 27 39.3
7. Temple 8 43 2581 60.0 550 14 39.1
8. Cincinnati 8 34 2020 59.4 400 12 38.8
9. ECU 8 43 2769 64.4 301 32 38.8
10. USF 8 60 3773 62.9 871 23 38.8
11. Houston 8 45 2675 59.4 527 20 36.6
12. SMU 8 52 3125 60.1 696 22 36.1
 
FIELD GOALS G Made-Att Pct.
1. Houston 8 7-7 1.000
2. Tulane 8 7-8 .875
3. USF 8 17-20 .850
4. Temple 8 12-16 .750
Memphis 8 6-8 .750
UCF 8 6-8 .750
7. UConn 8 10-14 .714
8. SMU 8 8-12 .667
9. Tulsa 8 7-11 .636
Cincinnati 8 7-11 .636
11. ECU 8 9-15 .600
12. Navy 8 5-9 .556
 
PAT KICKING G Made-Att Pct.
1. Memphis 8 52-52 1.000
UCF 8 47-47 1.000
Houston 8 30-30 1.000
Tulsa 8 25-25 1.000
5. ECU 8 26-27 .963
6. UConn 8 22-23 .957
7. Navy 8 26-28 .929
8. SMU 8 34-37 .919
9. USF 8 32-35 .914
10. Temple 8 21-23 .913
11. Tulane 8 27-30 .900
12. Cincinnati 8 16-18 .889
 
SACKS BY G No. Yards
1. USF 8 25 182
2. Memphis 8 19 120
3. UConn 8 18 115
4. Temple 8 17 108
SMU 8 17 120
6. Houston 8 16 108
7. UCF 8 11 70
8. Navy 8 10 67
9. Tulane 8 9 57
10. Tulsa 8 7 52
Cincinnati 8 7 52
12. ECU 8 5 29
 
SACKS AGAINST G No. Yards
1. Memphis 8 8 67
2. UCF 8 10 56
USF 8 10 71
4. Temple 8 11 94
ECU 8 11 82
Houston 8 11 71
7. Cincinnati 8 12 102
Navy 8 12 67
9. SMU 8 14 85
10. Tulane 8 15 115
11. Tulsa 8 21 120
12. UConn 8 26 150
 
FIRST DOWNS G Rush Pass Pen Total Avg/G
1. Memphis 8 69 122 21 212 26.5
2. UCF 8 77 103 19 199 24.9
3. SMU 8 69 109 19 197 24.6
4. ECU 8 52 124 20 196 24.5
5. USF 8 104 78 12 194 24.2
6. UConn 8 61 93 23 177 22.1
7. Navy 8 140 21 10 171 21.4
8. Houston 8 74 85 11 170 21.2
9. Tulane 8 99 60 10 169 21.1
10. Cincinnati 8 67 88 11 166 20.8
11. Temple 8 58 91 15 164 20.5
12. Tulsa 8 91 46 20 157 19.6
 
OPPONENT 1ST DOWNS G Rush Pass Pen Total Avg/G
1. Navy 8 51 84 13 148 18.5
2. Temple 8 79 58 21 158 19.8
3. Tulane 8 78 77 8 163 20.4
USF 8 68 75 20 163 20.4
5. UCF 8 71 84 16 171 21.4
6. Memphis 8 87 80 18 185 23.1
7. Tulsa 8 92 82 13 187 23.4
ECU 8 93 80 14 187 23.4
9. Houston 8 79 104 13 196 24.5
10. SMU 8 98 83 18 199 24.9
11. Cincinnati 8 88 93 22 203 25.4
12. UConn 8 77 120 15 212 26.5
 
3RD-DOWN CONVERSIONS G Conv. Att. Pct.
1. Memphis 8 50 104 48.1
2. UCF 8 48 101 47.5
3. Houston 8 51 111 45.9
4. Navy 8 50 111 45.0
5. SMU 8 52 117 44.4
6. ECU 8 61 139 43.9
7. USF 8 58 134 43.3
8. Tulane 8 50 116 43.1
9. Cincinnati 8 46 109 42.2
10. Temple 8 51 121 42.1
11. UConn 8 51 123 41.5
12. Tulsa 8 46 120 38.3
 
OPP 3RD-DN CONVERT G Conv. Att. Pct.
1. USF 8 43 123 35.0
2. Temple 8 43 120 35.8
3. Navy 8 42 104 40.4
4. Houston 8 56 136 41.2
5. Memphis 8 55 130 42.3
6. Tulsa 8 49 115 42.6
7. UCF 8 57 131 43.5
8. Tulane 8 45 101 44.6
9. SMU 8 51 112 45.5
10. UConn 8 62 123 50.4
11. Cincinnati 8 59 115 51.3
12. ECU 8 52 96 54.2
 
4TH-DOWN CONVERSIONS G Conv. Att. Pct.
1. SMU 8 9 14 64.3
2. USF 8 7 11 63.6
Cincinnati 8 7 11 63.6
4. Temple 8 9 15 60.0
ECU 8 12 20 60.0
6. Tulane 8 10 17 58.8
7. Navy 8 11 21 52.4
8. Tulsa 8 6 12 50.0
Memphis 8 6 12 50.0
UConn 8 8 16 50.0
11. Houston 8 5 12 41.7
12. UCF 8 2 12 16.7
 
OPP 4TH-DN CONVERT G Conv. Att. Pct.
1. UCF 8 7 21 33.3
2. UConn 8 5 14 35.7
3. USF 8 6 16 37.5
4. Tulane 8 7 15 46.7
5. SMU 8 9 17 52.9
6. Temple 8 8 15 53.3
7. Navy 8 7 13 53.8
8. Tulsa 8 6 10 60.0
9. Memphis 8 12 19 63.2
10. Houston 8 11 17 64.7
11. ECU 8 6 8 75.0
12. Cincinnati 8 8 8 100.0
 
PENALTIES G No. Yards Avg/G
1. Navy 8 38 407 50.9
2. Tulane 8 53 410 51.2
3. UConn 8 46 429 53.6
4. Houston 8 48 432 54.0
5. Tulsa 8 58 470 58.8
6. ECU 8 56 486 60.8
7. UCF 8 65 494 61.8
8. SMU 8 55 511 63.9
9. Memphis 8 63 550 68.8
10. Temple 8 62 596 74.5
11. Cincinnati 8 70 642 80.2
12. USF 8 70 695 86.9
 
OPPONENT PENALTIES G No. Yards Avg/G
1. UConn 8 74 668 83.5
2. Tulsa 8 65 634 79.2
3. Temple 8 66 611 76.4
4. ECU 8 60 566 70.8
5. Memphis 8 62 544 68.0
6. Cincinnati 8 54 485 60.6
7. SMU 8 49 481 60.1
8. UCF 8 54 457 57.1
9. USF 8 55 447 55.9
10. Tulane 8 43 418 52.2
Houston 8 51 418 52.2
12. Navy 8 51 393 49.1
 
TIME OF POSSESSION G Poss. Time Avg/G
1. Navy 8 286:24 35:48
2. Tulane 8 273:49 34:13
3. ECU 8 265:00 33:07
4. Temple 8 245:05 30:38
5. UConn 8 239:16 29:54
6. USF 8 238:47 29:50
7. SMU 8 234:11 29:16
8. Houston 8 219:19 27:24
9. UCF 8 218:44 27:20
10. Cincinnati 8 216:09 27:01
11. Tulsa 8 215:21 26:55
12. Memphis 8 212:55 26:36
 
Gained Lost
TURNOVER MARGIN G Fumb Int Total Fumb Int Total Margin Per/G
1. UCF 8 6 13 19 3 5 8 +11 1.38
2. Memphis 8 9 9 18 3 6 9 +9 1.12
3. Tulane 8 4 8 12 3 4 7 +5 0.62
4. USF 8 4 10 14 6 4 10 +4 0.50
5. SMU 8 5 8 13 3 7 10 +3 0.38
6. Houston 8 2 11 13 7 7 14 -1 -0.12
7. Tulsa 8 3 3 6 2 7 9 -3 -0.38
ECU 8 3 5 8 1 10 11 -3 -0.38
9. Cincinnati 8 2 3 5 4 5 9 -4 -0.50
UConn 8 3 4 7 5 6 11 -4 -0.50
11. Navy 8 4 4 8 8 8 16 -8 -1.00
12. Temple 8 5 6 11 5 15 20 -9 -1.12
 
Red Zone Touchdowns Field Goals Lost possession
RED ZONE OFFENSE G Scores-Chances  Pct. TDs Rush-Pass Made-Att Fumb Int. Downs Other
1. Houston 8 26-28 92.9 20 15-5 6-6 0 1 1 0
2. Memphis 8 35-38 92.1 31 17-14 4-5 1 0 1 0
3. Tulane 8 23-26 88.5 16 13-3 7-8 0 0 1 1
4. Tulsa 8 22-25 88.0 19 18-1 3-5 0 0 0 1
5. UConn 8 24-28 85.7 16 9-7 8-10 0 1 1 0
6. USF 8 32-38 84.2 19 14-5 13-14 1 1 2 1
7. Navy 8 26-31 83.9 22 18-4 4-6 0 1 1 1
8. UCF 8 31-37 83.8 27 18-9 4-4 2 1 3 0
9. Temple 8 25-30 83.3 16 8-8 9-9 0 1 2 2
10. SMU 8 28-34 82.4 23 12-11 5-6 1 2 1 1
11. Cincinnati 8 22-29 75.9 15 6-9 7-9 2 2 0 1
12. ECU 8 23-31 74.2 18 6-12 5-6 1 2 3 1
 
Red Zone Touchdowns Field Goals Lost possession
RED ZONE DEFENSE G Scores-Chances  Pct. TDs Rush-Pass Made-Att Fumb Int. Downs Other
1. Tulane 8 19-28 67.9 16 13-3 3-4 0 3 2 3
2. Houston 8 26-33 78.8 18 14-4 8-10 1 1 3 0
3. SMU 8 30-37 81.1 23 18-5 7-9 2 1 1 1
4. Memphis 8 28-33 84.8 22 15-7 6-6 0 2 3 0
5. USF 8 17-20 85.0 14 11-3 3-4 0 2 0 0
6. Tulsa 8 29-34 85.3 21 15-6 8-9 0 1 1 2
7. UConn 8 30-35 85.7 27 13-14 3-3 1 1 2 1
8. UCF 8 20-23 87.0 16 8-8 4-4 2 0 1 0
9. Temple 8 29-33 87.9 19 6-13 10-12 0 0 2 0
10. ECU 8 32-36 88.9 27 19-8 5-6 1 1 0 1
11. Navy 8 28-31 90.3 22 10-12 6-7 1 0 1 0
12. Cincinnati 8 29-32 90.6 17 12-5 12-14 0 0 0 1
 
ON-SIDE KICKS BY G On-side Pct.
1. UCF 8 1-1 100.0
2. Navy 8 1-3 33.3
3. Tulane 8 0-5 0.0
Memphis 8 0-1 0.0
Tulsa 8 0-1 0.0
Temple 8 0-1 0.0
SMU 8 0-1 0.0
Cincinnati 8 0-1 0.0
UConn 8 0-1 0.0
USF 8 0-0 0.0
ECU 8 0-0 0.0
Houston 8 0-0 0.0
 
ON-SIDE KICKS AGAINST G On-side Pct.
1. USF 8 0-4 0.0
Temple 8 0-3 0.0
UCF 8 0-1 0.0
Tulane 8 0-1 0.0
UConn 8 0-1 0.0
ECU 8 0-0 0.0
Cincinnati 8 0-0 0.0
Tulsa 8 0-0 0.0
Houston 8 0-0 0.0
Navy 8 0-0 0.0
SMU 8 0-0 0.0
12. Memphis 8 2-5 40.0
 
ATTENDANCE Home Avg   Away Avg   Neutral Avg   Total attend Avg
Cincinnati 4-104036 26009   4-129563 32391   0-0 0   8-233599 29200
ECU 4-134310 33578   4-125650 31412   0-0 0   8-259960 32495
Houston 4-120216 30054   4-94564 23641   0-0 0   8-214780 26848
Memphis 4-135012 33753   4-100636 25159   0-0 0   8-235648 29456
Navy 4-134988 33747   4-116910 29228   0-0 0   8-251898 31487
SMU 4-70821 17705   4-133524 33381   0-0 0   8-204345 25543
Temple 4-105877 26469   4-95456 23864   0-0 0   8-201333 25167
Tulane 4-69051 17263   4-98796 24699   0-0 0   8-167847 20981
Tulsa 4-74967 18742   4-77910 19478   0-0 0   8-152877 19110
UCF 4-150822 37706   4-112852 28213   0-0 0   8-263674 32959
UConn 4-76510 19128   4-99595 24899   0-0 0   8-176105 22013
USF 4-126544 31636   4-117698 29424   0-0 0   8-244242 30530
Totals 48-1303154 27149   48-1303154 27149   0-0 0   96-2606308 27149  
 

 

Individual Statistics

 

RUSHING Cl G Att. Yards Avg. TD Long Avg/G
1. BREWER, D'Angelo-TLS SR 7 174 939 5.4 4 46 134.1
2. ABEY, Zach-NAVY JR 7 188 786 4.2 9 54 112.3
3. FLOWERS, Quinton-USF SR 8 121 729 6.0 8 44 91.1
4. HILLIARD, Dontrell-TLN SR 8 154 727 4.7 9 60 90.9
5. JONES, Xavier-SMU SO 8 120 723 6.0 7 58 90.4
6. HENDERSON, D.-MEM FR 8 77 700 9.1 5 82 87.5
7. PERRY, Malcolm-NAVY SO 8 87 693 8.0 7 92 86.6
8. TICE, Darius-USF SR 8 114 622 5.5 7 54 77.8
9. KILLINS, JR., Adrian-UCF SO 8 83 617 7.4 8 96 77.1
10. JOHNSON, D'Ernest-USF SR 8 125 530 4.2 5 41 66.2
 
PASSING AVG/GAME Cl G Comp-Att-Int Pct. Yards TD Long Avg/G
1. FERGUSON, Riley-MEM SR 8 193 - 300 - 6 64.3 2717 24 89 339.6
2. MILTON, Mckenzie-UCF SO 8 163 - 243 - 5 67.1 2488 22 80 311.0
3. HICKS, Ben-SMU SO 8 195 - 311 - 6 62.7 2447 22 86 305.9
4. SHIRREFFS, Bry.-UCONN SR 6 125 - 182 - 4 68.7 1734 11 80 289.0
5. MINSHEW, Grdnr-ECU JR 6 143 - 234 - 5 61.1 1559 11 95 259.8
6. FLOWERS, Quinton-USF SR 8 126 - 239 - 4 52.7 1922 13 95 240.2
7. MOORE, Hayden-CIN JR 8 161 - 268 - 5 60.1 1846 14 75 230.8
8. SKIPPER, Luke-TLS FR 6 69 - 124 - 4 55.6 1131 3 74 188.5
9. BANKS, Jonathan-TLN JR 8 99 - 166 - 4 59.6 1473 9 73 184.1
10. NUTILE,Frank-TEM JR 6 84 - 142 - 7 59.2 1056 10 74 176.0
 
PASS EFFICIENCY Cl G Comp-Att-Int Pct. Yards TD Long Effic.
1. MILTON, Mckenzie-UCF SO 8 163 - 243 - 5 67.1 2488 22 80 178.8
2. SHIRREFFS, Bry.-UCONN SR 6 125 - 182 - 4 68.7 1734 11 80 164.3
3. FERGUSON, Riley-MEM SR 8 193 - 300 - 6 64.3 2717 24 89 162.8
4. HICKS, Ben-SMU SO 8 195 - 311 - 6 62.7 2447 22 86 148.3
5. BANKS, Jonathan-TLN JR 8 99 - 166 - 4 59.6 1473 9 73 147.2
6. NUTILE,Frank-TEM JR 6 84 - 142 - 7 59.2 1056 10 74 135.0
7. FLOWERS, Quinton-USF SR 8 126 - 239 - 4 52.7 1922 13 95 134.9
8. SKIPPER, Luke-TLS FR 6 69 - 124 - 4 55.6 1131 3 74 133.8
9. MOORE, Hayden-CIN JR 8 161 - 268 - 5 60.1 1846 14 75 131.4
10. MINSHEW, Grdnr-ECU JR 6 143 - 234 - 5 61.1 1559 11 95 128.3
 
RECEPTIONS/GAME Cl G Rec. Yards TD Long Avg/C Avg/G Rec/G
1. QUINN, Trey-SMU JR 8 84 876 10 77 10.4 109.5 10.5
2. MILLER, Anthony-MEM SR 8 61 957 11 89 15.7 119.6 7.6
3. BONNER, Linell-HOU SR 7 47 593 2 62 12.6 84.7 6.7
4. SUTTON, Courtland-SMU JR 8 49 800 7 49 16.3 100.0 6.1
5. DUNBAR, Steven-HOU SR 8 48 661 3 75 13.8 82.6 6.0
6. BROWN, Trevon-ECU JR 8 47 742 4 95 15.8 92.8 5.9
7. JOHNSON, Quay-ECU SR 6 34 328 2 31 9.6 54.7 5.7
8. LEWIS, Kahlil-CIN JR 8 43 499 4 75 11.6 62.4 5.4
9. GRAYSON, Davon-ECU SR 7 36 551 5 75 15.3 78.7 5.1
10. SMITH, Tre'Quan-UCF JR 8 36 756 8 79 21.0 94.5 4.5
 
RECEIVE YDS/GAME Cl G Rec. Yards TD Long Rec/G Avg/C Avg/G
1. MILLER, Anthony-MEM SR 8 61 957 11 89 7.6 15.7 119.6
2. QUINN, Trey-SMU JR 8 84 876 10 77 10.5 10.4 109.5
3. SUTTON, Courtland-SMU JR 8 49 800 7 49 6.1 16.3 100.0
4. SMITH, Tre'Quan-UCF JR 8 36 756 8 79 4.5 21.0 94.5
5. BROWN, Trevon-ECU JR 8 47 742 4 95 5.9 15.8 92.8
6. BONNER, Linell-HOU SR 7 47 593 2 62 6.7 12.6 84.7
7. DUNBAR, Steven-HOU SR 8 48 661 3 75 6.0 13.8 82.6
8. GRAYSON, Davon-ECU SR 7 36 551 5 75 5.1 15.3 78.7
9. ENCALADE, Terren-TLN JR 8 31 620 3 73 3.9 20.0 77.5
10. SCANTLING, Marquez-USF SR 8 36 544 3 95 4.5 15.1 68.0
 
TOTAL OFFENSE Cl G Rush Pass Plays Total Yds/G
1. MILTON, Mckenzie-UCF SO 8 322 2488 313 2810 351.2
2. FERGUSON, Riley-MEM SR 8 20 2717 327 2737 342.1
3. FLOWERS, Quinton-USF SR 8 729 1922 360 2651 331.4
4. HICKS, Ben-SMU SO 8 93 2447 350 2540 317.5
5. SHIRREFFS, Bry.-UCONN SR 6 88 1734 242 1822 303.7
6. MOORE, Hayden-CIN JR 8 240 1846 335 2086 260.8
7. MINSHEW, Grdnr-ECU JR 6 -16 1559 245 1543 257.2
8. BANKS, Jonathan-TLN JR 8 424 1473 268 1897 237.1
9. SKIPPER, Luke-TLS FR 6 112 1131 180 1243 207.2
10. ABEY, Zach-NAVY JR 7 786 566 231 1352 193.1
 
SCORING Cl G TD FG XPT 2XP Pts Pts/G
1. NADELMAN, Emilio-USF SR 8 0 17 32 0 83 10.4
2. TAYLOR, Patrick-MEM SO 7 10 0 0 0 60 8.6
ABEY, Zach-NAVY JR 7 10 0 0 0 60 8.6
4. MILLER, Anthony-MEM SR 8 11 0 0 0 66 8.2
5. WRIGHT, Matthew-UCF JR 8 0 6 47 0 65 8.1
6. PATTERSON, R.-MEM FR 8 0 6 46 0 64 8.0
7. QUINN, Trey-SMU JR 8 10 0 0 2 62 7.8
8. HILLIARD, Dontrell-TLN SR 8 10 0 0 0 60 7.5
9. BOUMERHI,Aaron-TEM SO 8 0 12 20 0 56 7.0
10. KILLINS, JR., Adrian-UCF SO 8 9 0 0 0 54 6.8
 
SCORING (TDs) Cl G TD Rush Pass Ret. PAT Pts Pts/G
1. TAYLOR, Patrick-MEM SO 7 10 10 0 0 0 60 8.6
ABEY, Zach-NAVY JR 7 10 9 1 0 0 60 8.6
3. MILLER, Anthony-MEM SR 8 11 0 11 0 0 66 8.2
4. QUINN, Trey-SMU JR 8 10 0 10 0 1 62 7.8
5. HILLIARD, Dontrell-TLN SR 8 10 9 1 0 0 60 7.5
6. KILLINS, JR., Adrian-UCF SO 8 9 8 1 0 0 54 6.8
SMITH, Tre'Quan-UCF JR 8 9 1 8 0 0 54 6.8
KING, D'Eriq-HOU SO 8 9 8 1 0 0 54 6.8
9. FLOWERS, Quinton-USF SR 8 8 8 0 0 0 48 6.0
PERRY, Malcolm-NAVY SO 8 8 7 1 0 0 48 6.0
 
SCORING (KICK) Cl G PATs FGs Pts Pts/G
1. NADELMAN, Emilio-USF SR 8 32-35 17-20 83 10.4
2. WRIGHT, Matthew-UCF JR 8 47-47 6-8 65 8.1
3. PATTERSON, R.-MEM FR 8 46-46 6-8 64 8.0
4. BOUMERHI,Aaron-TEM SO 8 20-22 12-16 56 7.0
5. GLOVER, Merek-TLN SO 7 26-28 7-8 47 6.7
6. VERITY, Jake-ECU SO 8 26-27 9-15 53 6.6
7. NOVIKOFF, Caden-HOU JR 8 30-30 7-7 51 6.4
8. TARBUTT, Mike-UCONN JR 7 22-22 7-10 43 6.1
9. JONES, Redford-TLS SR 8 25-25 7-11 46 5.8
10. WILLIAMS, Josh-SMU JR 8 22-24 7-11 43 5.4
 
PUNT RETURN AVG Cl G No. Yards TD Long Avg.
 
KICK RETURN AVG Cl G No. Yards TD Long Avg.
1. HUGHES, Mike-UCF JR 8 12 394 1 95 32.8
2. WRIGHT,Isaiah-TEM SO 8 12 304 1 98 25.3
3. PERRY, Malcolm-NAVY SO 8 11 276 0 58 25.1
4. WARREN II, Michael-CIN FR 8 15 354 0 41 23.6
5. SKANES, Quayvon-UCONN SO 8 18 409 0 42 22.7
6. JONES,Mike-TEM SR 8 14 308 0 36 22.0
7. BROWN, Trevon-ECU JR 8 19 411 0 48 21.6
8. BADIE, Sherman-TLN SR 8 16 333 0 32 20.8
9. LEDAY, John-HOU SR 7 18 374 0 43 20.8
10. STOKES, Keylon-TLS FR 8 26 527 0 39 20.3
 
ALL PURPOSE Cl G Rush Rcv PR KR Yards Yards/G
1. PERRY, Malcolm-NAVY SO 8 693 256 0 276 1225 153.1
2. BROWN, Trevon-ECU JR 8 16 742 2 411 1171 146.4
3. BREWER, D'Angelo-TLS SR 7 939 59 4 0 1002 143.1
4. HENDERSON, D.-MEM FR 8 700 194 0 174 1068 133.5
5. MILLER, Anthony-MEM SR 8 7 957 11 0 975 121.9
6. POLLARD, Tony-MEM SO 8 145 373 0 392 910 113.8
7. ABEY, Zach-NAVY JR 7 786 5 0 0 791 113.0
8. QUINN, Trey-SMU JR 8 0 876 4 0 880 110.0
9. WRIGHT,Isaiah-TEM SO 8 133 336 90 304 863 107.9
10. JOHNSON, D'Ernest-USF SR 8 530 91 50 143 814 101.8
 
PUNTING Cl G No. Yards Long Avg.
1. BARNES, Austin-ECU SR 7 32 1438 65 44.9
2. HERNANDEZ, Jon-USF SR 8 38 1652 63 43.5
3. SMITH, James-CIN FR 8 37 1608 65 43.5
4. BENNETT, Thomas-TLS SO 8 45 1891 67 42.0
5. WHITE, Owen-NAVY SO 8 28 1170 61 41.8
6. ROY, Dane-HOU SO 8 37 1542 59 41.7
7. JACOBS, Nick-MEM SR 7 16 657 53 41.1
8. SACKVILLE, Jamie-SMU SO 8 34 1391 64 40.9
9. LOUDERMILK, Mac-UCF JR 8 28 1140 69 40.7
10. STARZYK,Alex-TEM SR 8 32 1253 54 39.2
 
FIELD GOALS Cl G Made Att. Pct. Made/G
1. NADELMAN, Emilio-USF SR 8 17 20 85.0 2.12
2. BOUMERHI,Aaron-TEM SO 8 12 16 75.0 1.50
3. VERITY, Jake-ECU SO 8 9 15 60.0 1.12
4. GLOVER, Merek-TLN SO 7 7 8 87.5 1.00
TARBUTT, Mike-UCONN JR 7 7 10 70.0 1.00
6. NOVIKOFF, Caden-HOU JR 8 7 7 100.0 0.88
JONES, Redford-TLS SR 8 7 11 63.6 0.88
WILLIAMS, Josh-SMU JR 8 7 11 63.6 0.88
9. WRIGHT, Matthew-UCF JR 8 6 8 75.0 0.75
PATTERSON, R.-MEM FR 8 6 8 75.0 0.75
 
FIELD GOAL PCT Cl G Made Att. Long Pct.
1. GLOVER, Merek-TLN SO 7 7 8 37 87.5
2. NADELMAN, Emilio-USF SR 8 17 20 51 85.0
3. BOUMERHI,Aaron-TEM SO 8 12 16 41 75.0
PATTERSON, R.-MEM FR 8 6 8 42 75.0
WRIGHT, Matthew-UCF JR 8 6 8 47 75.0
6. TARBUTT, Mike-UCONN JR 7 7 10 42 70.0
7. WILLIAMS, Josh-SMU JR 8 7 11 46 63.6
JONES, Redford-TLS SR 8 7 11 51 63.6
9. VERITY, Jake-ECU SO 8 9 15 52 60.0
JONES, Ryan-CIN SO 8 6 10 30 60.0
 
PAT KICKING PCT Cl G Made Att. Pct.
1. WRIGHT, Matthew-UCF JR 8 47 47 100.0
PATTERSON, R.-MEM FR 8 46 46 100.0
NOVIKOFF, Caden-HOU JR 8 30 30 100.0
JONES, Redford-TLS SR 8 25 25 100.0
TARBUTT, Mike-UCONN JR 7 22 22 100.0
6. VERITY, Jake-ECU SO 8 26 27 96.3
7. MOEHRING, B-NAVY JR 7 22 23 95.7
8. GLOVER, Merek-TLN SO 7 26 28 92.9
9. WILLIAMS, Josh-SMU JR 8 22 24 91.7
10. NADELMAN, Emilio-USF SR 8 32 35 91.4
 

TACKLES (All positions) Cl G Pos. Solo Ast. Total Avg/G Sacks
1. MINOR, Jaylyin-CIN SR 8 LB 46 40 86 10.8 1.0
2. WHITFIELD, McKinley-TLS JR 8 47 38 85 10.6 0.0
3. HINES, D'Juan-HOU SR 8 43 37 80 10.0 0.0
4. WIGGINS, Korrin-ECU SR 7 DB 37 31 68 9.7 0.0
5. EDMISTON, Cooper-TLS SO 8 41 36 77 9.6 0.0
6. JOSEPH, Junior-UCONN SR 8 46 26 72 9.0 3.0
7. YOUNG, Perry-CIN SO 8 LB 35 29 64 8.0 0.0
8. JASINSKI, Pat-UCF JR 8 27 36 63 7.9 1.0
9. JACOBS, Carter-CIN SR 8 S 47 14 61 7.6 0.0
10. SANCHEZ, Auggie-USF SR 8 LB 34 26 60 7.5 2.0
11. ONU, Mikial-SMU SO 8 DB 48 11 59 7.4 0.0
DIGGS, Vontae-UCONN SR 8 36 23 59 7.4 0.0
13. AKINS, Curtis-MEM JR 6 27 17 44 7.3 0.5
14. MARBLEY, Rae Juan-TLN SR 8 LB 40 18 58 7.2 2.0
15. THOMAS, Micah-NAVY SR 8 34 23 57 7.1 0.5
SENAT, Deadrin-USF SR 8 DT 31 26 57 7.1 3.0
17. AVERY, Genard-MEM SR 8 36 18 54 6.8 6.5
18. RHONE, Anthony-SMU SR 7 LB 28 19 47 6.7 0.5
19. SUITS, Craig-TLS SR 8 26 27 53 6.6 0.0
20. BRADLEY,Shaun-TEM SO 8 30 22 52 6.5 0.0
BURKETT, Chequan-UCF SR 8 32 20 52 6.5 1.0
22. PALMORE, D.J.-NAVY SR 8 33 18 51 6.4 1.5
CHANDLER,Sean-TEM SR 8 36 15 51 6.4 0.0
MITCHELL, Kyran-SMU JR 8 LB 38 13 51 6.4 1.5
LAWLER, Justin-SMU SR 8 DE 31 20 51 6.4 7.5
26. BRUBAKER, Jesse-TLS SR 7 22 22 44 6.3 1.0
27. HALL, Austin-MEM SO 8 38 12 50 6.2 0.0
28. GRIFFIN, Shaquem-UCF SR 8 29 20 49 6.1 3.5
29. WILLIAMS, Sean-NAVY JR 8 38 10 48 6.0 0.0
FRANKLIN, Jarrod-TLN SR 8 S 36 12 48 6.0 1.0
ADAMS, Matthew-HOU SR 7 28 14 42 6.0 0.5
32. KUERSCHEN, Chase-TLN FR 8 S 35 12 47 5.9 0.0
OLIVER, Ed-HOU SO 8 28 19 47 5.9 5.5
34. CANNON, Diamon-TLS SO 8 21 25 46 5.8 0.0
SUTTON, Devon-ECU SO 8 DB 17 29 46 5.8 1.0
36. WILLIAMS, Terrell-HOU SR 8 28 17 45 5.6 0.0
HARRIS, Zachery-TLN JR 8 LB 30 15 45 5.6 0.0
38. RAMSEUR, Aaron-ECU FR 8 LB 23 21 44 5.5 0.0
WILLIAMS, Jrdn-ECU SR 8 LB 20 24 44 5.5 0.0
CLEMONS, Rodney-SMU SO 8 DB 34 10 44 5.5 0.0
41. COOK, Jonathan-MEM SR 8 34 8 42 5.2 0.0
42. NEAL, Tre-UCF JR 8 27 14 41 5.1 0.0
RANDALL,Delvon-TEM JR 8 32 9 41 5.1 0.0
44. COYLE, Tyler-UCONN SO 8 30 10 40 5.0 0.0
MOUHON, Kevin-CIN SO 8 DE 22 18 40 5.0 0.0
CARTER, T.J.-MEM FR 8 32 8 40 5.0 0.0
SUMMERS, Jamar-UCONN SR 7 30 5 35 5.0 1.0
WILLIAMS, Khalil-HOU SR 7 22 13 35 5.0 0.0
49. EGBULE, Emeke-HOU JR 8 22 17 39 4.9 1.0
COPELAND, Marquise-CIN JR 8 DT 21 18 39 4.9 2.5
 
SACKS Cl G Pos. Solo Ast. Yards Total Avg/G
1. LAWLER, Justin-SMU SR 8 DE 6 3 51 7.5 0.94
2. AVERY, Genard-MEM SR 8 5 3 47 6.5 0.81
3. MARTIN,Jacob-TEM SR 8 5 1 34 5.5 0.69
OLIVER, Ed-HOU SO 8 5 1 26 5.5 0.69
5. HECTOR, Bruce-USF SR 8 DT 4 2 42 5.0 0.62
FINCH,Sharif-TEM SR 8 5 0 35 5.0 0.62
ORMSBY, Cole-UCONN SR 8 5 0 25 5.0 0.62
8. LOVE, Mike-USF SR 8 DE 4 1 21 4.5 0.56
9. WEBB, Josh-NAVY JR 8 4 0 29 4.0 0.50
FATUKASI, Foley-UCONN SR 8 4 0 27 4.0 0.50
11. GRIFFIN, Shaquem-UCF SR 8 3 1 26 3.5 0.44
JOHNSON, C.-MEM SR 8 3 1 10 3.5 0.44
13. SMITH, Jeremy-TLS SR 8 3 0 34 3.0 0.38
JOSEPH, Junior-UCONN SR 8 3 0 24 3.0 0.38
BEAVERS, Darr.-UCONN FR 8 3 0 24 3.0 0.38
BROWN, Juwuan-USF JR 8 DE 3 0 22 3.0 0.38
SENAT, Deadrin-USF SR 8 DT 2 2 20 3.0 0.38
18. SCOTT, Delontae-SMU SO 7 DL 2 1 20 2.5 0.36
19. COPELAND, Marquise-CIN JR 8 DT 2 1 16 2.5 0.31
20. ANDERSON, Kiant-ECU SR 6 DE 2 0 19 2.0 0.33
 
TACKLES FOR LOSS Cl G Pos. Solo Ast. Yards Total Avg/G
1. AVERY, Genard-MEM SR 8 14 4 71 16.0 2.00
2. LAWLER, Justin-SMU SR 8 DE 9 5 58 11.5 1.44
3. OLIVER, Ed-HOU SO 8 9 4 44 11.0 1.38
4. MITCHELL, Kyran-SMU JR 8 LB 9 1 44 9.5 1.19
REAVES, Greg-USF SO 8 DE 7 5 32 9.5 1.19
LOVE, Mike-USF SR 8 DE 8 3 32 9.5 1.19
7. TAYLOR,Jullian-TEM SR 7 8 2 27 9.0 1.29
8. PALMORE, D.J.-NAVY SR 8 8 1 23 8.5 1.06
MARTIN,Jacob-TEM SR 8 7 3 39 8.5 1.06
FINCH,Sharif-TEM SR 8 8 1 49 8.5 1.06
11. MARBLEY, Rae Juan-TLN SR 8 LB 7 2 21 8.0 1.00
HECTOR, Bruce-USF SR 8 DT 7 2 61 8.0 1.00
SANCHEZ, Auggie-USF SR 8 LB 8 0 27 8.0 1.00
14. GODFREY, Leroy-HOU SO 8 6 3 26 7.5 0.94
FATUKASI, Foley-UCONN SR 8 7 1 36 7.5 0.94
SUITS, Craig-TLS SR 8 7 1 15 7.5 0.94
17. SENAT, Deadrin-USF SR 8 DT 5 4 29 7.0 0.88
BRADLEY,Shaun-TEM SO 8 5 4 13 7.0 0.88
19. FRANKLIN,Sam-TEM SO 8 5 3 22 6.5 0.81
20. BRUBAKER, Jesse-TLS SR 7 6 1 28 6.5 0.93
 
PASSES DEFENDED Cl G BrUp Int. Total Avg/G
1. HUGHES, Mike-UCF JR 8 8 3 11 1.38
CARTER, T.J.-MEM FR 8 8 3 11 1.38
3. NICHOLS, Deatrick-USF SR 8 7 3 10 1.25
COOK, Jonathan-MEM SR 8 9 1 10 1.25
5. CLEMONS, Rodney-SMU SO 8 8 1 9 1.12
MOORE, Brandon-UCF FR 8 8 1 9 1.12
NICKERSON, Parry-TLN SR 8 5 4 9 1.12
LEWIS, Donnie-TLN JR 8 8 1 9 1.12
9. WILKINS, Mazzi-USF JR 8 7 1 8 1.00
WOOTEN, Tyris-NAVY SR 7 7 0 7 1.00
JOHNSON, Isaiah-HOU JR 8 6 2 8 1.00
WHITFIELD, McKinley-TLS JR 8 7 1 8 1.00
13. ROBINSON II, Reggie-TLS SO 8 7 0 7 0.88
14. WYATT, Jordan-SMU JR 7 4 2 6 0.86
15. HALL, Austin-MEM SO 8 4 2 6 0.75
GIBSON, Kyle-UCF JR 8 3 3 6 0.75
ONU, Mikial-SMU SO 8 4 2 6 0.75
MYRES, Alexander-HOU SR 8 5 1 6 0.75
DAVIS, Garrett-HOU JR 8 3 3 6 0.75
WILLIAMS, Terrell-HOU SR 8 3 3 6 0.75
 
INTERCEPTIONS Cl G No. Yards TD
1. RANDALL,Delvon-TEM JR 8 4 16 0
NICKERSON, Parry-TLN SR 8 4 8 0
3. DAVIS, Garrett-HOU JR 8 3 94 0
WILLIAMS, Terrell-HOU SR 8 3 42 0
HUGHES, Mike-UCF JR 8 3 35 0
GIBSON, Kyle-UCF JR 8 3 26 0
NICHOLS, Deatrick-USF SR 8 3 14 0
CARTER, T.J.-MEM FR 8 3 7 0
9. SANCHEZ, Auggie-USF SR 8 2 108 2
WYATT, Jordan-SMU JR 7 2 55 1
 
FUMBLES FORCED Cl G No. Avg/G
1. WINDHAM, Tito-MEM JR 8 3 0.38
2. DIGGS, Vontae-UCONN SR 8 2 0.25
GRIFFIN, Shaquem-UCF SR 8 2 0.25
ROCHE,Quincy-TEM FR 8 2 0.25
AVERY, Genard-MEM SR 8 2 0.25
MARTIN,Jacob-TEM SR 8 2 0.25
7. HEFLIN, Taylor-NAVY JR 6 1 0.17
ANDERSON, Kiant-ECU SR 6 1 0.17
OWENS, Tyree-ECU JR 6 1 0.17
10. SCOTT, Delontae-SMU SO 7 1 0.14
 
FUMBLES RECOVERED Cl G No. Avg/G
1. ROBINSON,Delano-SMU FR 7 2 0.29
2. MARTIN,Jacob-TEM SR 8 2 0.25
HALL, Austin-MEM SO 8 2 0.25
4. ANDERSON, Kiant-ECU SR 6 1 0.17
AKINS, Curtis-MEM JR 6 1 0.17
FULLWODD, Tajee-USF JR 6 1 0.17
7. WILSON JR, Petera-TLS SR 7 1 0.14
BRUBAKER, Jesse-TLS SR 7 1 0.14
SLAUGHTER, C.-MEM SR 7 1 0.14
TEAMER, Roderic-TLN JR 7 1 0.14